Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.44 seconds)
Fujitsu Consulting India Pvt Ltd vs Commisioner Central Excise And Service ... on 23 February, 2022
cites
Section 73 in Finance Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Chandra Kishore Jha vs Mahavir Prasad & Ors on 21 September, 1999
That proposition of
law first was stated in Taylor v. Taylor (1876) 1 Ch. D426 and
adopted later by the Judicial Committee in Nazir Ahmed v. King
Emperor AIR 1936 PC 253 and by this Court in a series of
judgments including those in Rao Shiv Bahadur Singh & Anr. v.
State of Vindhya Pradesh AIR 1954 SC 322, State of Uttar
Pradesh v. Singhara Singh and Ors. AIR 1964 SC 358, Chandra
Kishore Jha v. Mahavir Prasad & Ors. 1999 (8) SCC 266,
Dhananjaya Reddy v. State of Karnataka 2001 (4) SCC 9 and
Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. V. Essar Power Ltld. 2008 (4) SCC
Rao Shiv Bahadur Singh And Another vs The State Of Vindhya Pradesh on 22 May, 1953
That proposition of
law first was stated in Taylor v. Taylor (1876) 1 Ch. D426 and
adopted later by the Judicial Committee in Nazir Ahmed v. King
Emperor AIR 1936 PC 253 and by this Court in a series of
judgments including those in Rao Shiv Bahadur Singh & Anr. v.
State of Vindhya Pradesh AIR 1954 SC 322, State of Uttar
Pradesh v. Singhara Singh and Ors. AIR 1964 SC 358, Chandra
Kishore Jha v. Mahavir Prasad & Ors. 1999 (8) SCC 266,
Dhananjaya Reddy v. State of Karnataka 2001 (4) SCC 9 and
Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. V. Essar Power Ltld. 2008 (4) SCC
Hussein Ghadially @ M.H.G.A.Shaikh & ... vs State Of Gujarat on 18 July, 2014
4.11 In the case of Hussein Ghadially v. State of Gujarat
[(2014) 8 SCC 425]
"19. Thirdly, because if the Statute provides for a thing to be
done in a particular manner, then it must be done in that
manner alone. All other modes or methods of doing that thing
must be deemed to have been prohibited.
Nazir Ahmad vs Emperor (No. 2) on 16 June, 1936
That proposition of
law first was stated in Taylor v. Taylor (1876) 1 Ch. D426 and
adopted later by the Judicial Committee in Nazir Ahmed v. King
Emperor AIR 1936 PC 253 and by this Court in a series of
judgments including those in Rao Shiv Bahadur Singh & Anr. v.
State of Vindhya Pradesh AIR 1954 SC 322, State of Uttar
Pradesh v. Singhara Singh and Ors. AIR 1964 SC 358, Chandra
Kishore Jha v. Mahavir Prasad & Ors. 1999 (8) SCC 266,
Dhananjaya Reddy v. State of Karnataka 2001 (4) SCC 9 and
Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. V. Essar Power Ltld. 2008 (4) SCC
State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Singhara Singh And Others on 16 August, 1963
That proposition of
law first was stated in Taylor v. Taylor (1876) 1 Ch. D426 and
adopted later by the Judicial Committee in Nazir Ahmed v. King
Emperor AIR 1936 PC 253 and by this Court in a series of
judgments including those in Rao Shiv Bahadur Singh & Anr. v.
State of Vindhya Pradesh AIR 1954 SC 322, State of Uttar
Pradesh v. Singhara Singh and Ors. AIR 1964 SC 358, Chandra
Kishore Jha v. Mahavir Prasad & Ors. 1999 (8) SCC 266,
Dhananjaya Reddy v. State of Karnataka 2001 (4) SCC 9 and
Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. V. Essar Power Ltld. 2008 (4) SCC
Dhanajaya Reddy vs State Of Karnataka on 14 March, 2001
4.10 Hon'ble Apex Court has similarly in case of Dhananjaya
Reddy vs. State of Karnataka, [(2001) 4 SCC 9](para 22), stated
the said principle as follows: