Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.28 seconds)

Smt. Rajesh And Others vs Rajbir Singh And Others on 29 January, 2010

So far as allowances being paid to the deceased and as shown in the salary Slip Ex PW2/2 is concerned. Ld Counsel for the petitioner as well as Ld Counsel for the insurance company has conceded that these allowances are personal incentives of deceased and varied from time to time. So by deducting the Conveyance allowances, Washing allowances, cycle allowance, shift allowances, attendance allowances and by adding basic salary, Dearness allowances and HRA, the income for the purpose of computation of compensation is taken as Rs.10,165/­ p.m. No tax have been deducted on the salary of victim. So as per the judgment, in the case Rajesh Vs Rajbir Singh 2013 ACJ 1403 SC of Hon'ble Supreme Court, the net income of the deceased is to be counted after adding future benefit @ 30%. There are six LRs of victim so he ( deceased) is presumed to be spending 1/5th of his income on his personal expenses. So the loss of dependency has to be taken as Rs. 10,571.60/­ (10,165/­ +3049.50/­ ­ 2642.90/­) per month.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 5161 - R Bindal - Full Document

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds) on 11 April, 2023

20. Petition in hands is allowed. Respondent no.3 is directed to pay a sum of Rs. 21,59,699/­ alongwith interest @ 7.5% p.a from the date of filing of claim petition i.e. 20.11.2017 till the date of compliance i.e., 13.10.2023. Amount of MACT no.1335/2016 Asha & Ors. Vs. Mukesh & ors. Page 13 of 16 interim compensation (if any) be deducted from this amount. The awarded amount shall remain as tax free in view of the judgment of Hon'ble High Court in case in R/Special Civil Application No.4800 of 2021 titled The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd Vs Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) decided on 05.04.2022. APPORTIONMENT:
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 50 - Full Document
1