cites: 68929224

1 - 10 of 39 (0.46 seconds)

Girish Kumar Suneja vs Cbi on 27 October, 2016 cites

A.S. Impex Limited And Ors. vs Delhi High Court And Ors. on 13 November, 2003

Therefore, I complete the formality and overrule A.S. Impex [A.S. Impex Ltd. v. Delhi High Court, (2003) 107 DLT 734] since it does not lay down the correct law in this regard."

Delhi High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 10 - O P Dwivedi - Full Document

Article 142 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Constitution Article Cites 3 - Cited by 14698

Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Constitution Article Cites 3 - Cited by 387520

Article 141 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Constitution Article Cites 1 - Cited by 10646

A.R. Antulay vs R.S. Nayak & Anr on 29 April, 1988

As already noted above, the law laid down in Antulay [A.R. Antulay v. R.S. Nayak, (1988) 2 SCC 602 : 1988 SCC (Cri) 372] has limited CRL.M.C. 3847/2016 Page 11 of 18 application and is not relevant to cases such as the one we are dealing with.

Supreme Court of India Cites 153 - Cited by 1309 - S Mukharji - Full Document

Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 644872

Mahender Singh vs High Court Of Rajasthan on 5 January, 2015

14. A Division Bench of this Court in Mahender Singh Vs. High Court of Delhi & Anr. (2009) 151 Company case 485 (Delhi) negating the contention that the right to prefer a revision was a legal right held:

Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 49784

Section 138 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 151705

Section 6 in The General Clauses Act, 1897 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 4858

1 2 3 4 Next

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results