Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.74 seconds)

Shri Ram General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Bhagat Singh Rawat on 27 March, 2023

9. It has been argued on behalf of the appellants that consortium granted to the appellants is on the lower side as each of the claimants was entitled to consortium of Rs.1 lakh each. I find the said argument to be misplaced. As per recent judgments of the Hon'ble "Shri Ram General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Bhagat Singh Supreme Court in "Shri Rawat & Others"
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 2 - Cited by 66 - Full Document

Divisional Controller K.S.R.T.C. vs Bommanna Shetty @ Saritha B. Shetty . on 11 July, 2016

10. From the above facts, it is clear that a very just and fair compensation has been awarded to the appellant. Nothing whatsoever has been shown to this Court that would merit enhancement of the compensation granted to the appellant. Accordingly, in view of the discussion above, I find no case is made out which merits interference with the impugned Award. I find the compensation awarded to the 4 of 5 ::: Downloaded on - 25-01-2025 09:49:56 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2025:PHHC:009185 Page 5 of 5 appellant to be just and fair in the facts and circumstances of the case. No doubt Chapter-12 Chapter of the Act is a beneficial al legislation yet, as cautioned by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the same cannot be allowed to be treated as a windfall or a source of profit. Hon'ble Supreme Court in ''State of Haryana Vs. Jasbir Kaur' Law Finder Doc ID # 64043 and 'Divisional Controller K.S.R.T.C. K.S.R.T.C. Vs. Mahadev Shetty', (2003) 7 SCC 197, has held that the amount of compensation should be just and reasonable, it should neither be a bonanza nor a source of profit but at the same time it should not be a pittance. Thus, all that has to be determi determined in the facts of a given case is, that the compensation accorded is 'just'. In my considered view, in the present case, the learned Tribunal has awarded a very 'just' compensation, which is in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court Court and therefore, does not warrant the interference of this Court.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1