Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.24 seconds)
Maharashtra State Electricity ... vs Adani Power Maharashtra Limited on 20 April, 2023 cites

Maharashtra State Electricity ... vs M/S. Technocraft Industries (I) Ltd. ... on 20 January, 2023

29. When we heard this batch of Electricity appeals, it was agreed between all the parties that this Court should first decide Civil Appeal No. 684 of 2021 (MSEDCL v. APML and Others (supra)) and Civil Appeal No. 6927 of 2021 (Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited v. GMR Warora Energy Ltd. and Others) inasmuch as three of the issues involved in all the appeals in the batch were common. It was submitted that those two appeals could be decided by deciding the three common issues. However, insofar as the other appeals are concerned, 16 it was submitted that, in addition to the three common issues, certain additional issues were also involved and it was agreed that after those two appeals are decided, the other appeals should be heard for considering these additional issues.
Bombay High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 4 - G S Kulkarni - Full Document

Vivek Narayan Sharma vs Union Of India on 2 January, 2023

“123. Recently, the Constitution Bench of this Court in the case of Vivek Narayan Sharma v. Union of India has held that the Courts should be slow in interfering with the decisions taken by the experts in the field and unless it is found that the expert bodies have failed to take into consideration the mandatory statutory provisions or the decisions taken are based on extraneous considerations or they are ex facie arbitrary and illegal, it will not be appropriate for this Court to substitute its views with that of the expert bodies.”
Supreme Court of India Cites 126 - Cited by 9 - B R Gavai - Full Document

Nabha Power Ltd. (Npl) vs Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. ... on 5 October, 2017

8.15 Adani further prayed before to direct MSEDCL that in so far as the costs incurred towards transportation of coal from the Lohara Coal Blocks to Tiroda TPS is concerned the same may be considered based on applicable Railway Freight with applicable taxes and duties, while determining the landed cost of coal from the Lohara Coal Blocks. We are in agreement with this contention. It is no longer res integra that landed cost of coal includes transportation costs. Supreme Court's judgment in Nabha Power Ltd. vs. Punjab State Power Corp. Ltd. (2018) 11 SCC 508 is locus classicus on the subject wherein it was held that landed costs cannot exclude transportation costs viz.:-
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 14 - Cited by 126 - S K Kaul - Full Document

Manohar Lal Sharma vs The Principle Secretary & Others on 25 August, 2014

15. On 25th August 2014, this Court, in its judgment in the case of Manohar Lal Sharma v. The Principal Secretary and Others1, held the allocation of coal blocks made by the Screening Committee from 14th July 1993 onwards to be illegal. On 16th April 2015, Ministry of Power (for short, “MoP”) issued a policy direction under Section 107 of the 1 (2014) 9 SCC 516 8 Electricity Act, 2003 to treat allocation of coal block under Coal Mine (Special Provisions) Ordinance, 2014 as a ‘Change in Law’ event. On 28th January 2016, the MoP notified the revised Tariff Policy.
Supreme Court of India Cites 66 - Cited by 935 - R M Lodha - Full Document
1   2 Next