Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.28 seconds)Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950
Vikram Singh vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 25 August, 2020
13. Given the nature of the allega ons and the other circumstances peculiar to this
case, the pe oner shall not enter the vic m's property, workplace, and residence un l
the statements of all non-official and informal witnesses in the trial are recorded. This
Court is imposing this condi on to rule out any aHempt by the accused to incapacitate,
influence, or cause any discomfort to the vic m. Reference be made to Vikram Singh v
Central Bureau of Inves ga on, 2018 All SCR (Crl.)
Aparna Bhat vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 18 March, 2021
458); and Aparna BhaH v. The State of
Madhya Pradesh, 2021:INSC:192, 2021 SCC Online SC 230.
Mohammed Zubair vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 20 July, 2022
In Mohammed Zubair v.
State of NCT of Delhi, 2022:INSC:735 [Para 28], Writ Pe on (Criminal) No 279 of 2022,
Para 29, decided on July 20, 2022, A Three-Judge bench of Hon'ble Supreme Court holds
that "The bail condi ons imposed by the Court must not only have a nexus to the
purpose that they seek to serve but must also be propor onal to the purpose of
imposing them. The courts, while imposing bail condi ons must balance the liberty of
the accused and the necessity of a fair trial. While doing so, condi ons that would result
in the depriva on of rights and liber es must be eschewed."
The Arms Act, 1959
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
1