Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.62 seconds)Section 138 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 251 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Basalingappa vs Mudibasappa on 9 April, 2019
18. The presumptions in favor of the complainant in cases u/s
138 NI Act were explained by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
Basalingappa v. Mudibasappa, 2019 SCC OnLine SC 491. The
relevant portion is stated below -
Anurag Pandey vs State Of Chhattisgarh 13 Wps/2365/2018 ... on 16 March, 2018
DLST020173562023
Anurag Pandey Vs. Om Prakash
CT Case No. 7120/2023
PS : Neb Sarai
Anurag Pandey
S/o Sh.Shugan Pandey,
R/o C-1-546, Sangam Vihar,
Near Sehrawat Gas Agency,
Deoli, South Delhi, New Delhi-110062
.............Complainant
Versus
Om Prakash
S/o Sh. Bhawani Ram
R/o H. No. G-94, Samagam Vihar,
New Delhi-110062
Also At C-1/381, Sanagam Vihar,
Near Nanki Public School, New Delhi-110062
.............. Accused
Date of registration : 17.08.2023
Date of Judgment : 05.12.2024
Decision : Acquittal
Digitally signed
by SIDDHANT
KUMAR
SIDDHANT
Date:
KUMAR 2024.12.05
14:25:22
CT Case No. 7120/2023 +0530
Anurag Pandey Vs. Om Prakash Page No.1 of 14
FACTS
1