Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.22 seconds)Basant Jatav vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 27 December, 2018
It is also observed in the case of Gulabchand Kannoolal
Vs. State of M.P., 1982 MPLJ 7 that the word "dacoity" as
The High Court of Madhya Pradesh
MCRC 52764/2018
(Basant Jatav Vs. State of M.P.)
used in clause (f) is to be understood in the sense as it is
defined in the Indian Penal Code, S.391.
Gorelal Gupta And Ors. vs State Of Madhya Pradesh And Ors. on 20 February, 1984
In the case of Gorelal Gupta Vs. State of M.P.,
reported in 1984 MPLJ 361 it is observed that " It is an
enactment to curb the menace of dacoity and kidnapping in
affected areas of the State in order to protect the public
against organized gangs of dacoits. So it deals with special
types of people i.e. dacoits and their associates in affected
areas in respect of specified offences. It has come to be
realized that to stop the menace of dacoits and kidnapping
more stringent and speedy measures are necessary and that
is why this special enactment. The provisions of the Act are
not discriminatory and are not hit by Article 14."
Gulabchand Patel vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 24 July, 2017
It is also observed in the case of Gulabchand Kannoolal
Vs. State of M.P., 1982 MPLJ 7 that the word "dacoity" as
The High Court of Madhya Pradesh
MCRC 52764/2018
(Basant Jatav Vs. State of M.P.)
used in clause (f) is to be understood in the sense as it is
defined in the Indian Penal Code, S.391.
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 2 in The M.P. Dakaiti Aur Vyapharan Prabhavit Kshetra Adhiniyam, 1981 [Entire Act]
Section 11 in The M.P. Dakaiti Aur Vyapharan Prabhavit Kshetra Adhiniyam, 1981 [Entire Act]
Section 13 in The M.P. Dakaiti Aur Vyapharan Prabhavit Kshetra Adhiniyam, 1981 [Entire Act]
Section 395 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Shivprsad Panika @ Lallu vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 June, 2018
It is observed in the case of Lallu Vs. State of M.P.
reported in 1985 MPWN 486 that " by opposition is not meant,
opposition for the sake of opposition.