Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.17 seconds)Section 8 in The Hindu Minority And Guardianship Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
The Hindu Minority And Guardianship Act, 1956
Section 9 in The Guardians And Wards Act, 1890 [Entire Act]
Daya Narain Khatri & Ors. vs Sh. Suresh Kumar Gupta & Anr. on 28 July, 1998
Further, in Daya Narain Khatri &
Ors. vs. Suresh Kumar Gupta & Anr. 1999 (1) RAJ 476 (Del), it was held
that letters of administration is not required in relation to any part of a
property of a Hindu, who has died intestate, in terms of Section 212(1) of
the Indian Succession Act, 1925. It is concluded that the undertaking
given by petitioner in her petition and evidence will be complied, for the
benefit and welfare of minor.
Jagjeet Kaur vs State on 25 February, 2014
5. (Final submissions) - At the stage of final hearing, petitioner's
Counsel Shri R.K. Sachdeva, Advocate made final submissions, based
on pleading and evidence that the circumstances are self explanatory as
to how the need has arisen for the petitioner to file petition for permission
to sell the undivided half share of minor in the estate; the sale is being
proposed, as it is for the welfare of minor, who is ClassÂI legal heir of
deceased and petitioner is also natural mother of minor. She has no
adverse interest towards the ward, besides there is no opposition to the
petition from any other quarter. The petitioner relies upon Jagjeet Kaur
vs. State 2014 (208) DLT 474, wherein appellant/petitioner was granted
GP No. 01/2016 Page 6 of 10
Koyel Mathur vs. State
permission to sell share of the minors located in back portion of the first
floor of the property, pursuant to the provisions of Section 8 of the Hindu
Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956.
1