Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.22 seconds)
Uma Devi vs M/O Defence on 18 February, 2026 cites

Shamsher Singh & Anr vs State Of Punjab on 23 August, 1974

"9. The law regarding the termination of service of a probationer is no more res integra. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Shamsher Singh & Anr. Vs State of Punjab, reported in 1975 (1) SCR 814 [LQ/SC/1974/248] , clarified that 'No abstract proposition can be laid down that where the services of a probationer are terminated without saying anything more in the order of termination than that the services are terminated it can never amount to a punishment in the facts and circumstances of the case. If a probationer is discharged on the ground of misconduct, or inefficiency or for similar reason without a proper enquiry and without his getting a reasonable opportunity of showing cause against his discharge it may in a given case amount of removal from service within the meaning of Art. 311 (2) of the Constitution'.
Supreme Court of India Cites 110 - Cited by 317 - A N Ray - Full Document

The Chief General Manager,State Bank Of ... vs Shri Bijoy Kumar Mishra on 24 September, 1997

12. Now the question is whether if the probation period is not extended within its time, it shall be a deemed confirmation or not. This issue was considered time and again by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and in catena of judgments has held that deemed confirmation after the expiry of the maximum probation period is not an automatic or implied process but requires a positive express act of confirmation by the employer. An explicit order of confirmation is necessary, and mere continuation in service is not sufficient to presume deemed confirmation (vide High Court of M.P through Registrar Vs. Satya Narayan Thavar - 2001 6 Supreme 106, Suman Sharma Vs. Union of India - 2014 0 Supreme (HP) 1454, Chief General Manager, State Bank of India Vs. Bijoy Kumar Mishra - 1997 8 Supreme 388, Wasim Beg Vs. State of U.P - 1998 3 Supreme 21, Amit Sharma Vs. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and others 2025 Supreme (Online) (Del) 2603).
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 15 - Full Document

Wasim Beg vs State Of Uttar Pradesh & Ors on 5 March, 1998

12. Now the question is whether if the probation period is not extended within its time, it shall be a deemed confirmation or not. This issue was considered time and again by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and in catena of judgments has held that deemed confirmation after the expiry of the maximum probation period is not an automatic or implied process but requires a positive express act of confirmation by the employer. An explicit order of confirmation is necessary, and mere continuation in service is not sufficient to presume deemed confirmation (vide High Court of M.P through Registrar Vs. Satya Narayan Thavar - 2001 6 Supreme 106, Suman Sharma Vs. Union of India - 2014 0 Supreme (HP) 1454, Chief General Manager, State Bank of India Vs. Bijoy Kumar Mishra - 1997 8 Supreme 388, Wasim Beg Vs. State of U.P - 1998 3 Supreme 21, Amit Sharma Vs. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and others 2025 Supreme (Online) (Del) 2603).
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 78 - S V Manohar - Full Document

Mr. Suman Sharma vs Union Of India . on 21 April, 2016

12. Now the question is whether if the probation period is not extended within its time, it shall be a deemed confirmation or not. This issue was considered time and again by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and in catena of judgments has held that deemed confirmation after the expiry of the maximum probation period is not an automatic or implied process but requires a positive express act of confirmation by the employer. An explicit order of confirmation is necessary, and mere continuation in service is not sufficient to presume deemed confirmation (vide High Court of M.P through Registrar Vs. Satya Narayan Thavar - 2001 6 Supreme 106, Suman Sharma Vs. Union of India - 2014 0 Supreme (HP) 1454, Chief General Manager, State Bank of India Vs. Bijoy Kumar Mishra - 1997 8 Supreme 388, Wasim Beg Vs. State of U.P - 1998 3 Supreme 21, Amit Sharma Vs. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and others 2025 Supreme (Online) (Del) 2603).
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1   2 Next