Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.17 seconds)
State Of Haryana And Another vs Unknown on 7 September, 2010 cites

The State Of Haryana And Another vs Ravi Chand Garg And Another on 20 July, 2010

29. There is another apparent contradiction in the fact stated in the application filed for seeking condonation of delay in re-filing, namely, that in a communication, which was endorsed to Mr. O. P. Sharma, Advocate on 2.12.2005 from the Land Acquisition Officer, Faridabad to Director, Urban Estates, Panchkula on the subject regarding appeal in land acquisition case on behalf of the State for Sector 21-D, Faridabad, it was mentioned that Letters Patent Appeals filed by the State and the land owners had been dismissed by this Court on 3.3.2005, accordingly no appeal in the above case was required to be filed, whereas in paragraph 12 of the application, it was stated that this court vide judgment dated 10.8.2005, passed in L.P.A. No. 1367 of 2001, titled as "State of Haryana v. Suresh Chand Garg", had reduced the market value of the land to ` 250/- per square yard. This court is unable to visualise any reason for not filing the appeal when it was known that the earlier filed appeals had been accepted and the amount of compensation had been reduced.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - R Bindal - Full Document
1