Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.20 seconds)Section 20 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Mujibur Rehman vs Central Information Commission on 28 April, 2009
9. This Court in Mujibur Rehman Vs. Central Information Commission
MANU/DE/0542/2009 held that information seekers are to be furnished what they ask for
and are not to be driven away through filibustering tactics and it is to ensure a culture of
information disclosure that penalty provisions have been provided in the RTI Act. The Act
has conferred the duty to ensure compliance on the PIO.
M/S S.J. And S.P. Family Trust vs Chhattisgarh State Minor Forest ... on 18 May, 2018
Furthermore, The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the decision J P Aggarwal v. Union of India (WP
(C) no. 7232/2009 while stating that the CPIO should not mechanically forward the information
collected through subordinates, held as under that:
Somasundaram Corporation (Pvt.) Ltd,. ... vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu ... on 30 January, 1999
Moreover, the Hon'ble High Court of Madras in the matter B. Muthuramalingam vs. The State of
Tamil Nadu and Ors. W.P. No. 28895 of 2010 dated 26.02.2018 had held as under:
Mr.Triveni Prasad Bahuguna vs Life Insurance Corporation Of India on 6 September, 2012
The Commission observed that the framework of the RTI Act, 2005 restricts the jurisdiction of
the Commission to provide a ruling on the issues pertaining to access/ right to information and to
venture into the merits of a case or redressal of grievance. The Commission in a plethora of
decisions including Shri Vikram Singh v. Delhi Police, North East District,
CIC/SS/A/2011/001615 dated 17.02.2012 Sh. Triveni Prasad Bahuguna vs. LIC of India,
Lucknow CIC/DS/A/2012/000906 dated 06.09.2012, Mr. H. K. Bansal vs. CPIO & GM (OP),
MTNL CIC/LS/A/2011/000982/BS/1786 dated 29.01.2013 had held that RTI Act was not the
proper law for redressal of grievances/disputes.
Union Of India vs Namit Sharma on 3 September, 2013
The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the matter of Union of India v. Namit Sharma in
REVIEW PETITION [C] No.2309 OF 2012 IN Writ Petition [C] No.210 OF 2012 with State of
Rajasthan and Anr. vs. Namit Sharma Review Petition [C] No.2675 OF 2012 In Writ Petition [C]
No.210 OF 2012 had held as under:
Hansi Rawat & Anr. vs Punjab National Bank & Ors. on 11 January, 2013
Furthermore, the High Court of Delhi in the matter of Hansi Rawat and Anr. vs. Punjab National
Bank and Ors. LPA No.785/2012 dated 11.01.2013 held as under:
Shobha Vijender vs Chief Information Commissioner & Ors on 29 November, 2017
A similar view delineating the scope of the Commission's jurisdiction was also taken by the
Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in Sher Singh Rawat vs. Chief Information Commissioner and Ors.,
W.P. (C) 5220/2017 and CM No. 22184/2017 dated 29.08.2017 and in the matter of Shobha
Vijender vs. Chief Information Commissioner W.P. (C) No. 8289/2016 and CM 34297/2016
dated 29.11.2016.