Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.20 seconds)The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
The Limitation Act, 1963
Babu Ram Gupta vs Sudhir Bhasin & Anr on 12 April, 1979
8.1 In
the case of Babu Ram Gupta (supra), the issue involved therein was
with regard to Contempt of Court which is not the issue in the
present appeal. Hence, the said observations cannot be considered
qua the present case.
Section 11 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Pushpa Devi Bhagat (D) Th. Lr.Smt. ... vs Rajinder Singh & Ors on 11 July, 2006
22. It
is now a well settled principle of law that a counsel can make not
only concession on a question of law but also on facts which would be
binding on the parties. A decree can be passed on the basis of such
concession in terms of Order XXII, Rule 6 of the Code of Civil
Procedure. [ 1975 See
Jamilabai Abdul Kadar vs. Shankarlal Gulabchand and Ors. ,
Pushpa
Devi Bhagat v. Rajinder Singh,
and BSNL and Others v. Subash Chandra Kanchan)."
Jamilabai Abdul Kadar vs Shankerlal Gulabchand & Ors on 30 April, 1975
22. It
is now a well settled principle of law that a counsel can make not
only concession on a question of law but also on facts which would be
binding on the parties. A decree can be passed on the basis of such
concession in terms of Order XXII, Rule 6 of the Code of Civil
Procedure. [ 1975 See
Jamilabai Abdul Kadar vs. Shankarlal Gulabchand and Ors. ,
Pushpa
Devi Bhagat v. Rajinder Singh,
and BSNL and Others v. Subash Chandra Kanchan)."
Ramdev Food Products Pvt. Ltd vs Arvindbhai Rambhai Patel & Ors on 29 August, 2006
Indu Shekhar Singh & Ors vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 28 April, 2006
In
Indu Shekhar Singh and Ors. v. State of U.P. and Ors.
2006 (5) SCALE 107, this Court held:
Saroj Anand & Ors vs Prahlad Rai Anand & Ors on 25 February, 2009
(iv) In
the case of Saroj Anand and Others vs. Prahlad Rai Anand and
Others reported in 2009(15) SCC 505 paras 19, 20 & 22 as
recorded by the Apex Court read as under: