Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.28 seconds)Section 14 in The U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Section 27 in The U.P. Imposition Of Ceiling On Land Holdings Act, 1960 [Entire Act]
Section 132 in The U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Section 27 in The U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
The U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950
Section 43 in The U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Management Of M.C.D vs Prem Chand Gupta And Anr on 16 December, 1999
18. From the provisions of the two Acts, referred to above, it is evident that the power under Section 198(4) of 1950 Act can be exercised by a ''Collector' appointed under 1901 Act. From a plain reading one may refer to only Section 14 of 1901 Act but that would amount to ignore the legislature's intention and not to give effect to the legislative declaration under sub-section (4) of Section 14-A of 1950 Act. To ascertain and to give full meaning, as per legislative intent, one has to read sub-section (4) of Section 3 of 1950 Act together with Section 14 and Section 14-A of 1901 Act. It is true that in finding out the meaning of the word ''Collector' used in the Act, the ordinary meaning given in the definition clause is to be construed, but it is not inflexible and there may be sections in the Act where the meaning have to be departed from on account of the subject or context in which the word had been used. That is why, the definition clause starts with the sentence that unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context ''Collector' means an officer appointed as ''Collector' under the provisions of 1901 Act. Therefore, because of this qualification, while giving correct meaning of definition of the word ''Collector' used in the Act, one has not only to look at the word but also to the context, the collocation and the object of such words relating to such matter and thereafter to interpret the meaning intended to be conveyed by the use of the words under the circumstances.
Yakub Abdul Razak Memon vs State Of Maharashtra Th:Cbi Mumbai on 21 March, 2013
14. As a result of the aforesaid discussion, it must be held that the termination of the respondent workman from service on 29.4.1966 was not violative of the amended Rule 5 of the latter Rules of 1965 which only applied in his case. Therefore, there was no obligation, on the part of the appellant Corporation to simultaneously offer requisite compensation to the respondent workman as a condition precedent to such termination and such compensation could be offered to him within reasonable time later on. The termination had to be treated to have come into force forthwith when the order of termination was passed and served on the respondent workman. Non-payment of requisite compensation as per the said rule even later on did not attract any invalidating consequences. The first point of determination, therefore, is held in the negative in favour of the appellant and against the respondent workman. " (emphasis supplied)
In Yakub Abdul Razak Memon v. State of Maharashtra4 three learned Judges of the Supreme Court were called upon to resolve a contended conflict between the provisions made in TADA and the Juvenile Justice Act. Dealing with that question the Supreme Court held thus: -