Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.19 seconds)Section 9 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 21 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Maharashtra State Electricity Board vs Datar Switchgear Ltd. on 7 October, 2002
The Petitioner is willing to furnish a bank guarantee, and if the
interim order dated 22nd October, 2013 can be continued, the
Petitioner undertakes to keep the bank guarantee alive.
Further, reliance is placed on the judgment of the Bombay High Court
in Maharashtra State Electricity Board v. Datar Switchgear Ltd.
(2002 SCC Online Bom 983) to argue that the decision of the ld.
Tirupati Building And Office Pvt. Ltd vs Delhi Development Authority on 12 September, 2023
In May, 2011, the Petitioner also filed an application under Section
11(6) of the 1996 Act, being Arbitration Petition No. 365/2010 titled 'M/s.
Tirupati Buildings and Offices Pvt. Ltd. v. DDA'. Vide order dated 12th
May, 2011, in the said petition, the ld. Sole Arbitrator was appointed to
adjudicate upon the disputes between the parties arising out of the Tender
Document. In July, 2011, the ld. Sole Arbitrator entered reference.
1