Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 26 (0.25 seconds)Megha Singh vs State Of Haryana on 9 February, 1995
This finds further support from the decision in the case of Megha Singh v. State of Haryana . It was then contended on behalf of the opposite party/CBI that in absence of any illegality or irregularity in course of investigation resulting in miscarriage of justice, it cannot be said that the investigation, inquiry or trial can be vitiated.
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 468 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 471 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
P. Ramachandra Rao vs State Of Karnataka on 16 April, 2002
62. Mr. Roy also placed reliance upon the decision in the case of P. Ramachandra Rao v. State of Karnataka ; State of Rajasthan v. Ikbal Hussen reported in 2004(4) A.LC.L.R. 664 and State of Bihar v. Baidnath Prasad alias Baidyanath Shah and Anr. reported in 2002 SCC (Cri) 148.
State Of Rajasthan vs Ikbal Hussen on 8 September, 2004
62. Mr. Roy also placed reliance upon the decision in the case of P. Ramachandra Rao v. State of Karnataka ; State of Rajasthan v. Ikbal Hussen reported in 2004(4) A.LC.L.R. 664 and State of Bihar v. Baidnath Prasad alias Baidyanath Shah and Anr. reported in 2002 SCC (Cri) 148.
S. Jeevanantham vs State Through Inspector Of Police, Tn on 21 April, 2004
In order to respond to the challenge thrown by the petitioner, Mr. Roy deriving inspiration from the decision in the case of S. Jeevanantham v. State through Inspector of Police, Tamil Nadu reported in AIR 2004 SC 4808, contended that in absence of any prejudice being caused, mere fact that the case was registered by a person who conducted such proceeding and. proceeded with investigation, it cannot be said that the investigation was done in a biased manner. It was mentioned that the petitioner could not satisfactorily establish that the investigating authority was in any way personally interested in the case.
A. C. Sharma vs Delhi Administration on 5 February, 1973
In this context, reference was made to the decision in the case of A.C. Sharma v. Delhi Administration ; Union of India v. Prakash P. Hinduja and Anr. .