Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.27 seconds)The Arms Act, 1959
Section 12 in The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 [Entire Act]
Section 439 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Income Tax Act, 1961
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Vikram Singh vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 25 August, 2020
15. Given the nature of the allegations and the other circumstances peculiar to this
case, the petitioner shall not enter the property, workplace, and residence of the victim
until the statements of all non-official and informal witnesses in the trial are recorded.
This Court is imposing this condition to rule out any attempt by the accused to
incapacitate, influence, or cause any discomfort to the victim. Reference be made to
Vikram Singh v Central Bureau of Investigation, 2018 All SCR (Crl.)
Aparna Bhat vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 18 March, 2021
458); and Aparna
Bhatt v. The State of Madhya Pradesh, 2021:INSC:192, 2021 SCC Online SC 230.
Mohammed Zubair vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 20 July, 2022
18. In case the Investigator/Officer-In-Charge of the concerned Police Station
arraigns another section of any penal offense in this FIR, and if the new section
prescribes a maximum sentence that is not greater than the sections mentioned above,
then this bail order shall be deemed to have also been passed for the newly added
section(s). However, suppose the newly inserted sections prescribe a sentence exceeding
the maximum sentence prescribed in the sections mentioned above; then, in that case, the
Investigator/Officer-In-Charge shall give the petitioner notice of a minimum of seven
days, providing an opportunity to avail the remedies available in law.
1