Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.34 seconds)The Arbitration Act, 1940
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Om Construction Co vs Ahmedabad Municipal Corp.& Anr on 13 January, 2009
The Clause 60 in respect of price variation is scored off entirely
along with the caption and 60A is inserted. Similarly, Clauses
72, 73 and 77 have been scored off along with their captions. As
against this, Clause no.30 clearly indicate that the said clause is
partly retained as the scoring off is only qua the procedure as
could be seen from page no.97 where the clause 30 the
arbitration is figuring. The learned counsel for the petitioner's
reliance upon the observation of Om Construction (supra) would
therefore, clearly indicate that the lack of procedure or
prescription of the procedure cannot permit parties to wriggle out
of their initial agreement to submit to the arbitration. The
decision cited at the bar on behalf of the respondent so far as,
their ratio and proposition of law concerned, cannot be disputed,
but they proceed on the premise with regard to the arbitration
clause and its existence, whereas in the instant case, the scoring
off of part of the clause and leaving the clause 30 with its caption
intact with an assurance to supply a separate sheet would
conclusively be indicative of the fact that there existed a clear
intention of parties to submit to the arbitration tribunal in case
of the dispute.
The Gujarat Revenue Tribunal Act, 1957
Section 9 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Finance Act, 1999
The Gujarat University Act, 1949
Section 2 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Executive Engineer, R.E.O. vs Suresh Chandra Panda (Dead) Through Lrs on 12 January, 1999
In fact, in Executive Engineer RCO vs. Suresh Chandra
Panda [1999 (9) SCC 92], this Court considered the effect of
the said clause relating to execution of nontendered items, vis
`vis clause 23 in a pre1981 contract. This court held that the
said clause (then numbered as clause 11, numbered as clause
10 in subsequent contracts) was a provision which excluded the
issue relating to finality of rates, from the scope of arbitration
agreement contained in clause 23 on the following reasoning :