The State Of Himachal Pradesh vs Rajeev Kumar on 2 January, 2014
According
to the witness, her clothes had also become blood stained but it is
State Vs. Rajeev Kumar etc., FIR No. 435/11 PS Sultanpuri Page No.10 of 35
correct that she did not hand over the same to the police at any point of
time and has voluntarily explained that police never asked her for the
same. She has deposed that when she reached the hospital, her parents
came there within one hour and remained with her thereafter and has
voluntarily explained that her natural parents have expired and it is her
Bua and Phupha who had brought her up and had come to the hospital.
She admits that she had made her statement to the police in the presence
of her Bua and Phupha. According to the witness, at the time of
incident no neighbour had collected. She has denied that since no such
incident had taken place, therefore no neighbours had collected and has
voluntarily added that her in laws are highly abusive and therefore no
neighbours intervened. She has deposed that she has good relation with
her Jethani Suman but has denied that she have filed this case on her
tutoring. She has further denied that the present case has been filed on
legal advise and on tutoring of her Bua and Phupha and Jethani. She
has denied that no such incident had taken place or that the injuries
received by her were self inflicted or that accused persons were not
present in the house at the time of incident. Witness has deposed that
she had also filed a complaint in the CAW Cell four years ago but the
same was compromised by the Panchayat.