Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 51 (0.45 seconds)

Ramesh Chandra Agrawal vs Regency Hospital Ltd. & Ors on 11 September, 2009

51. Undoubtedly, it is the duty of an expert witness to assist the Court effectively by furnishing it with the relevant report based on his expertise along with his reasons, so that the Court may form its independent judgment by assessing such materials and reasons furnished by the expert for coming to an appropriate conclusion. Be that as it may, it cannot be forgotten that opinion evidence is advisory in nature, and the Court is not bound by the evidence of the experts. [See State (UT of Delhi) v. Pali Ram12 ; State of H.P. v. Jai Lal13; Baso Prasad v. State of Bihar14; Ramesh Chandra Agrawal v. Regency Hospital Ltd.11 [(2009) 9 SCC 709 : (2009) 3 SCC (Civ) 840] and Malay Kumar Ganguly v. Sukumar Mukherjee15.]
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 161 - H L Dattu - Full Document

Meharaj Singh (L/Nk.) vs State Of U.P. on 21 April, 1994

"60. On the importance of promptitude, both in the registration of the FIR and in the transmission of the same to the court, reliance is placed by Shri Nagamuthu, learned Senior Counsel on the following passage in Meharaj Singh v. State of U.P.3: (SCC pp. 195-196, para 12) "12. FIR in a criminal case and particularly in a murder case is a vital and valuable piece of evidence for the purpose of appreciating the evidence led at the trial. The object of insisting upon prompt lodging of the FIR is to obtain the earliest information regarding the circumstance in which the crime was committed, including the names of the actual culprits and the parts played by them, the weapons, if any, used, as also the names of the eyewitnesses, if any. Delay in lodging the FIR often results in embellishment, which is a creature of an afterthought. On account of delay, the FIR not only gets bereft of the advantage of spontaneity, danger
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 239 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next