Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.87 seconds)

Uday Pratap Singh Rajput vs Smt. Premlal @ Premwati Rajput W/O Padam ... on 11 September, 2023

9. From the side of respondent No.1, an e-mail dated 09.10.2023 has been received by us seeking adjournment of the matter on the ground that respondent No.1 has challenged this Tribunal's order dated 21.09.2023 before the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay, by which the delay in filing the present application has been condoned and that this Tribunal should not hear the present matter any further till the said Writ Petition (L) No.26718 of 2023 is disposed of, in view of the law laid down in the matter of Kishore Rajput vs. Preeti Rajput reported in [2007 3 BCR 279], where-in the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in para no.8 stated that "when this Court seized of the matter, it is expected of the subordinate courts to stay their hands away". We do not find a copy of the said Writ Petition annexed with this application. It is further mentioned that this matter is likely to be taken up on 16.10.2023, therefore, hearing of the present matter should be adjourned.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - A K Singh - Full Document
1