Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (0.24 seconds)

Commissioner Of Central Excise & ... vs Manohar Lal Hira Lal Ltd. (In Appeal No. ... on 11 November, 2016

3rd Floor...Adarsh Dham Building, Vapi-Daman Road, Vapi Opp.Vapi Town Police Station, Vapi, Gujarat-396191 WITH i. Excise Appeal No. 10032 of 2020 (Mr Rikhabchand V Mehta) ii. Excise Appeal No. 10033 of 2020 (Mr Ganpat V Mehta) iii. Excise Appeal No. 10034 of 2020 (Harsh Kumar) iv. Excise Appeal No. 10035 of 2020 (Mr Sanjay Agarwal) v. Excise Appeal No. 10036 of 2020 (MR LALITBABLANI) vi. Excise Appeal No. 10074 of 2020 (Naval Basudev Agarwal) (Arising out of OIO-DMN-EXCUS-000-COM-045-18-19 dated 30/03/2019 passed by Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax-DAMAN) APPEARANCE:
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 2 - Cited by 40 - Full Document

M/S Shri Bajrangbali Ingot & Steels Pvt. ... vs Cce, Raipur on 1 December, 2011

7|Page E/12432/2019, E/10032-10036,10075/2020 4.1 We also noticed that the reliance of third party documents/ records placed by the learned Commissioner while conforming demand against present appellant is also observed to be unjustified and unreasonable. It has been consistently held by the court and tribunal that demands of whatever nature cannot be confirmed solely on the basis of third party's evidence/records. The relevant case law in the case of Bajrangbali Ingots & Steel Pvt. Ltd. & Suresh Agarwal v. CCE, Raipur in Appeal Nos. E/52062 & 52066/2018 which is held as follows :-
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 4 - Cited by 8 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next