Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.37 seconds)
Sri.A.Kumar @ Guru Kumar. A vs Icici Lombard General Insurance on 11 February, 2015 cites

Sarla Verma & Ors vs Delhi Transport Corp.& Anr on 15 April, 2009

Taking note of the injuries sustained by the petitioner and treatment undergone and his avocation, the disability assessed by the doctor appears to be reasonable. Therefore, looking to the nature of avocation and age of the petitioner, this Tribunal feels to take the physical impairment of the petitioner at 10% to the whole body. As I have already taken the income of the petitioner at Rs.6,000/- p.m. and his age as 49 years, loss of future earnings has to be assessed. Taking note of the multiplier which is directed to be used by the Tribunals as per the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Smt. Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation- 2009 ACJ 1298 (SC) the multiplier suggested to the age group 46 to 50 years would be '13, the loss of future earnings can be assessed as follows: Rs.6,000 x 12 x 13 x 10/100 = Rs.93,600/-
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 20141 - R V Raveendran - Full Document
1   2 Next