Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 43 (0.68 seconds)Section 53 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Selvi & Ors vs State Of Karnataka & Anr on 5 May, 2010
However, the judgment
of Supreme Court in Selvi v. State of Karnataka (supra) and
judgment of Delhi High Court in Rohit Shekhar v. Shri Narayan
Dutt Tiwari and another case (referred supra), it is clear that in
paternity disputes, DNA test can be directed and it would not
violate the right of privacy or fundamental right guaranteed under
Article 20(3) or Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
Section 54 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
The State Of Bombay vs Kathi Kalu Oghad And Others on 4 August, 1961
Learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on State
of Bombay v. Kathi Kalu Oghad (referred supra), Naveen
Krishna Bothireddy v. State of Telangana and another (referred
supra), and Bhabani Prasad Jena etc. v. Convener Secretary
Orissa State Commission for Women (referred supra).
Section 53A in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 50 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Rohit Shekhar vs Shri Narayan Dutt Tiwari & Anr. on 23 September, 2011
However, the judgment
of Supreme Court in Selvi v. State of Karnataka (supra) and
judgment of Delhi High Court in Rohit Shekhar v. Shri Narayan
Dutt Tiwari and another case (referred supra), it is clear that in
paternity disputes, DNA test can be directed and it would not
violate the right of privacy or fundamental right guaranteed under
Article 20(3) or Article 21 of the Constitution of India.