Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.19 seconds)Mohd. Rizwan & Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic ... on 29 March, 2019
Both these special appeals are directed against the common judgment and order dated 3.4.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge of this court in Writ-A No.713 of 2019, (Reena Singh and 74 Ors Vs. State of U.P. & 3 Ors) and other connected matters, whereby the writ petitions were allowed in terms of the judgment delivered by the learned Single Judge, Lucknow Bench of this Court in leading petition being Service Single No.1188 of 2019, (Mohd. Rizwan and Others Vs. State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Basic Education Lko & Ors) along with other connected matters.
Municipal Corporation Of Delhi vs Surender Singh . on 1 August, 2019
(102) The Apex Court in the case of Municipal Corporation of India vs. Surender Singh and others (supra), while adjudicating a similar controversy pertaining to the fixation of minimum qualifying marks for selection of the most meritorious has been pleased to uphold as legal and valid the action of the competent authority for fixing the minimum qualifying marks which were fixed after examination was held, but prior to the declaration of the result, since the advertisement did not specify any qualifying marks for the examination in question, and the candidates had participated in the examination knowing fully well that no qualifying marks have been fixed in the advertisement and the same will be fixed prior to declaration of the result.
Smt. Reena Singh And Ors. vs State Of U.P.Throu.Addl.Chief ... on 11 December, 2018
Both these special appeals are directed against the common judgment and order dated 3.4.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge of this court in Writ-A No.713 of 2019, (Reena Singh and 74 Ors Vs. State of U.P. & 3 Ors) and other connected matters, whereby the writ petitions were allowed in terms of the judgment delivered by the learned Single Judge, Lucknow Bench of this Court in leading petition being Service Single No.1188 of 2019, (Mohd. Rizwan and Others Vs. State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Basic Education Lko & Ors) along with other connected matters.
Jharkhand Public Service Commission vs Manoj Kumar Gupta on 18 December, 2019
(105) For the reasons aforementioned, it cannot be said that the Government Order dated 7.1.2019 is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India nor it makes an unreasonable classification or is nullifying the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Anand Kumar Yadav (supra).
Section 5 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Commissioner Municipal Corporation ... vs Surendra Singh (D) Thr Lrs. on 1 November, 2018
(103) The power of the Government to prescribe the qualifying marks of passing the examination even after the advertisement and the examination in exercise of power conferred under Rule 2 (x) of 1981 Rules is supported by the judgment of the Apex Court in Municipal Corporation of Delhi vs. Surendra Singh and others (supra) and Jharkhand Pubic Service Commission vs. Manoj Kumar Gupta and others (supra). From the aforesaid, we are of the view that the decision of the Government for fixing of the minimum qualifying marks cannot be faulted.
Bhola Prasad Shukla vs Union Of India on 16 January, 2020
Accordingly, we set aside the impugned order 29.3.2019 passed in Writ Petition No.1188 (SS) of 2019 and other connected matters filed by Shiksha Mitras and dismiss the said writ petitions by allowing all the Special Appeals and direct the State of U.P. to declare the result of examination which was held on 6.1.2019 in terms of the Government Order dated 7.1.2019 at the earliest as directed by the Apex Court in the case of Bhola Prasad Shukla v. Union of India and others (supra). All applications for intervention/ impleadment/civil miscellaneous applications are also disposed of in same terms. "
1