Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.34 seconds)

Jayant Bhargava vs Priya Bhargava on 1 April, 2011

In Jayant Bhargava v. Priya Bhargava, 2011 SCC OnLine Del 1651, the Hon'ble Court observed that while guessing the income of the spouse, when the sources of income are either not disclosed or not correctly disclosed, the Court can take into consideration amongst others the factors including life style of the spouse; the amount spent at the time of marriage and the manner in which marriage was performed; destination of honeymoon; ownership of motor vehicles; household facilities; facility of driver, cook and other help; credit cards; bank account details; club memberships; amount of insurance premium paid; property or properties purchased; rental income; amount of rent paid; amount spent on travel/holiday; locality of residence; number of mobile phones; qualification of spouses; school(s) where the child or children are studying when parties were residing together; amount spent on fees and other expenses incurred; amount spend on extra-curricular activities of children when parties were residing together; capacity to repay loan.

Shamima Farooqui vs Shahid Khan on 6 April, 2015

11. Having regard to the overall facts and circumstances, this Court finds that the impugned order reflects a balanced assessment of the Petitioner's earning capacity, the Respondents' needs, and the social standing of the parties. The quantum of interim maintenance fixed does not warrant interference at this stage. However, it is clarified that the interim arrangement shall remain subject to modification upon evidence being led 2 Shamima Farooqui v. Shahid Khan (2015) 5 SCC 705; Anju Garg v. Deepak Kumar Garg 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1314.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 541 - D Misra - Full Document

Anju Garg vs Deepak Kumar Garg on 28 September, 2022

11. Having regard to the overall facts and circumstances, this Court finds that the impugned order reflects a balanced assessment of the Petitioner's earning capacity, the Respondents' needs, and the social standing of the parties. The quantum of interim maintenance fixed does not warrant interference at this stage. However, it is clarified that the interim arrangement shall remain subject to modification upon evidence being led 2 Shamima Farooqui v. Shahid Khan (2015) 5 SCC 705; Anju Garg v. Deepak Kumar Garg 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1314.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 84 - B M Trivedi - Full Document

Zahir Abdullah & Anr vs Omar Abdullah on 18 January, 2023

In a recent judgment dt 31/08/2023, in case titled As Zahir Abdullah Vs Omar Abdullah (Crl.Rev.P. 604/2018 & Crl.M.A. 28262/2018), the Hon'ble Delhi High Court discussed the law in detail on the grant of interim maintenance u/s 125 CrPC. The court reiterated that the principle underlying Section 125 Cr.P.C. For the sake of brevity, the relevant observations made in para 21, 22 & 24 are not being reproduced.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - S K Sharma - Full Document
1