Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.21 seconds)

Shri. Arun Kumar Tiwari vs . Union Of India & Ors. on 28 July, 2023

(emphasis supplied) Page 3 of 4 CAT, Lucknow Bench O.A. No. 332/00477/2023 Arun Kumar Tiwari Vs. UOI & Ors. 6.2 In the instant case it is not in dispute that the applicant was a Group 'C' employee. It is also not in dispute that the respondents, on review of the applicant's service records, revised his pay with effect from 01.09.2008 and ordered recovery vide the change memo dated 12.10.2023.
Meghalaya High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - H S Thangkhiew - Full Document

State Of Punjab & Ors vs Rafiq Masih (White Washer) on 18 December, 2014

4. The respondents state that 3rd MACP should have accrued to the applicant from 22.12.2019, i.e., 10 years due date of 2nd MACP on 12.09.2009, but erroneously the 3rd MACP was granted on 22.12.2009 and 2nd MACP on 01.09.2008. It is contended that the mistake was rectified in light of the Railway Board's letter dated 31.08.2022 and show cause notice dated 18.08.2023 was issued to the applicant and the order dated 12.10.2023 issued thereafter. It is further contended that the applicant's status as Group 'C' employee is irrelevant as he derives satisfactory salary and no harsh recovery will be caused and, therefore, Rafiq Masih (supra) is not attracted in the applicant's case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 7379 - J S Khehar - Full Document
1