Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.28 seconds)The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Section 6 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 11 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Kaliyappan vs State Of Kerala & Ors on 28 October, 1988
Insistence therein is on "making" of
award. For computation of period of two years in Section
11-A, two points of time between which the said period
needs to be computed are required. It, still, does not
indicate date of award but points out the event of making
of award. As already seen, what constitutes making of an
award is already explained by the Hon'ble Apex Court in
Kaliyappan v. State of Kerala, Hon'ble Court points out that
"to make an award" in this section means "sign the award".
That is the ordinary meaning to be ascribed to the words
"to make an award".
Section 12 in The Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 [Entire Act]
The Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966
The Right To Fair Compensation And Transparency In Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013
Indore Development Authority vs Manoharlal And Ors. Etc. on 6 March, 2020
5. Per contra, the learned A.G.P. and the learned Senior Advocate Mr.
5/18
::: Uploaded on - 24/03/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 25/03/2023 18:00:45 :::
WP 7092 09 J.odt
Hon for the respondent No. 4-Municipal Council would vehemently submit
that in view of the constitution bench judgment in the matter of Indore
Development Authority vs Manoharlal And Ors.;(2020) 8 SCC 129, applying
the same analogy, the petitioners are not entitled to claim any relief as is
being claimed. They would submit that the present acquisition proceeding
was initiated under the Act and even the award was passed way back on
29.12.1994 under Section 11 of the Act. They would submit that the notice
to the owners as is contemplated under Section 12(2) of the Act does not go
to the root of the validity of the award passed under Section 11. The
demand for the amount of compensation as per the award was raised with
the respondent No. 4-Municipal Council but it expressed inability and as a
result the compensation could not be paid to the petitioners and the other
land owners albeit possession was taken on 18.10.1994.