Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.28 seconds)

Kaliyappan vs State Of Kerala & Ors on 28 October, 1988

Insistence therein is on "making" of award. For computation of period of two years in Section 11-A, two points of time between which the said period needs to be computed are required. It, still, does not indicate date of award but points out the event of making of award. As already seen, what constitutes making of an award is already explained by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Kaliyappan v. State of Kerala, Hon'ble Court points out that "to make an award" in this section means "sign the award". That is the ordinary meaning to be ascribed to the words "to make an award".
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 34 - E S Venkataramiah - Full Document

Indore Development Authority vs Manoharlal And Ors. Etc. on 6 March, 2020

5. Per contra, the learned A.G.P. and the learned Senior Advocate Mr. 5/18 ::: Uploaded on - 24/03/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 25/03/2023 18:00:45 ::: WP 7092 09 J.odt Hon for the respondent No. 4-Municipal Council would vehemently submit that in view of the constitution bench judgment in the matter of Indore Development Authority vs Manoharlal And Ors.;(2020) 8 SCC 129, applying the same analogy, the petitioners are not entitled to claim any relief as is being claimed. They would submit that the present acquisition proceeding was initiated under the Act and even the award was passed way back on 29.12.1994 under Section 11 of the Act. They would submit that the notice to the owners as is contemplated under Section 12(2) of the Act does not go to the root of the validity of the award passed under Section 11. The demand for the amount of compensation as per the award was raised with the respondent No. 4-Municipal Council but it expressed inability and as a result the compensation could not be paid to the petitioners and the other land owners albeit possession was taken on 18.10.1994.
Supreme Court of India Cites 442 - Cited by 1731 - A Mishra - Full Document
1   2 Next