Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (1.06 seconds)
Sukesh Kumar Maurya vs The State Of Bihar on 29 September, 2022 cites

Pramod Kumar Srivastava vs Chairman, Bihar Public Service ... on 6 August, 2004

The decision in Pramod Kumar Srivastava v. Bihar Public Service Commission [(2004) 6 SCC 714] was followed by another three-Judge Bench of this Court in Board of Secondary Education v. Pravas Ranjan Panda [(2004) 13 SCC 383] in which the direction of the High Court for re-evaluation of answer books of all the examinees securing 90% or above marks was held to be unsustainable in law because the regulations of the Board of Secondary Education, Orissa, which conducted the examination, did not make any provision for re-evaluation of answer books in the rules.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 410 - G P Mathur - Full Document

Maharashtra State Board Of Secondary ... vs Paritosh Bhupesh Kumar Sheth Etc on 17 July, 1984

11. In our considered opinion, neither the learned Single Judge nor the Division Bench of the High Court could have substituted his/its own views for that of the examiners and awarded two additional marks to Respondent 1 for the two answers in exercise of powers of judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution as these are purely academic matters. This Court in Patna High Court CWJC No.7790 of 2020 dt.29-09-2022 13/20 Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education v. Paritosh Bhupeshkumar Sheth [(1984) 4 SCC 27] has observed: (SCC pp. 56-57, para 29) "29. ... As has been repeatedly pointed out by this Court, the court should be extremely reluctant to substitute its own views as to what is wise, prudent and proper in relation to academic matters in preference to those formulated by professional men possessing technical expertise and rich experience of actual day-to-day working of educational institutions and the departments controlling them. It will be wholly wrong for the court to make a pedantic and purely idealistic approach to the problems of this nature, isolated from the actual realities and grassroots problems involved in the working of the system and unmindful of the consequences which would emanate if a purely idealistic view as opposed to a pragmatic one were to be propounded."
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 990 - V B Eradi - Full Document
1   2 Next