Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.18 seconds)Section 30 in Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
Suseela And Ors. vs A.S.L. Rajan on 21 June, 1999
9. That apart, this court in the case of Suseela and 4 others Vs.
A.S.L.Rajan [1999-2-LW-772] referring to the classification of suit property in
revenue records as Agricultural land, held that so long as there is no
modification or variation in the classification of the suit lands from nanja
into 'house sites' and in the absence of any material produced by the Defendants
for establishing the same, the court fee has to be paid only as kist paying
lands. It is held thus:-
Kamaleshwar Kishore Singh vs Paras Nath Singh & Ors on 22 November, 2001
In the case of Kamaleshwar Kishore Singh Vs. Paras Nath Singh
and others [2001-4-CTC-764], it is held that the court fee has to be paid on
plaint as framed and not as it ought to have been framed, unless while drafting
the plaint the Plaintiff had attempted at evading payment of court fee by his
astuteness in drafting. It is held that it is substance of relief and not form
which will be determinative of valuation and payment of court fee.
Section 2 in Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
1