purchased from one Seeni Thevar the suit property, which was paimash No. 26 subsequently correlated during the survey as Section No. 379/2. The suit ... suit property comprised in S. No. 379/2 ccrresponded to old paimash Nos. 69 (p) and 35 (p), that those paimash numbers belonged
observations in Karumbavira Vanniar (Supra);
This position is made clear from the paimash accounts
and the subsequent surveys. Mala Thattimal, which till 1919
formed part ... covered as we said an
extent of 26-21 acres. In the Paimash accounts of the year
1829 the area was designated
plaintiffs is that the suit properties are Nanja lands in old Paimash Nos. 586, 557 and 558 corresponding to new Survey ... written statement that the first defendant has nothing to do with paimash No. 586 or paimash No. 557, that he had purchased the lands bearing
cents comprised in S. No. 97/1 said to correspond to Paimash No. 248/D forming item 1; 5 acres 50 cents of land comprised ... said to correspond to Paimash Nos. 221 and 365 forming item 2; and specific 13 acres 79 bents out Of 44 acres 13 cents comprised
present case. It is sufficient to refer to the paimash register of 1829 in which the temple is described as having the ekabogam miras ... forties of last century. They were all included in the paimash or survey of Tanjore which, in this case, took place in 1829, They were
acres at Adampakkam Village at old Survey, which
was known as Paimash No. 722/4. The factum of ownership of
the respondent ... decreed in their favour in
respect of 1.80 acres land at Paimash No. 722/4 and which
decree had attained finality by dismissal of special
observations in Karumbavira Vanniar (Supra);
This position is made clear from the paimash accounts and the subsequent surveys. Mala Thattimal, which till 1919 formed part ... covered as we said an extent of 26-21 acres. In the Paimash accounts of the year 1829 the area was designated
placing large extents of land in Yerranagavari Palle village and in paimash Nos. 120 to 139 of Penubalakala hamlet in Chittoor District in the Prohibitory ... respect of the forest areas of Yerranagavaripalle village and those covered by paimash Nos. 120 to 139 of Penubalakala hamlet. The government directed that
others in respect of the lands and building comprised in Paimash Nos.716, 717, 718/1, 721/3, 722/2, 859 and 860 in Survey ... garment factory to the extent of 2.72 acres in Paimash No.860 in S.No.24/2 and TS.No.105 and in respect
years back. The reference to the properties by mentioning the Paimash numbers alone has been wantonly made for the purpose of staking a false claim ... Alandur Village through their corresponding Paimash numbers is nothing but a false and fraudulent claim and the said power of attorney is illegal, void
