Baij Nath Prasad And Ors. vs Ram Gopal Lachhmi Narayan And Ors. on 6 July, 1937
mf © S mt wD 4.4 ae a) Q
@ i oO, aod bes o G G + . a ef bg & th io ne; e Ea by
43 3 wy rf t "5 us ~s ot 43 ts oped ay : : ie bo a * _ Ff
i % " 0 yo 6 & 8 % a Pog a a : od ay ie
G C mS 4 os a Mos c o o be SS wog § a
7 4 si 2 he 'ti eT . At xo ey ; Wal " : C by %
#44 tt OY $3 i; Oo ' 4 © "i 3 G pot 5
: + hed oO a8 hd a oy o a hog gy *
Aes nes a) by xp
G4 Na. 6922016
4
Che applicant Submitte that he was wot
Pressing the challenge to Ene answer key and
Was restricting his application to the aspect
r te be, Po bBo wee San, we hey "4 Soe ded i
OF the CARLLenge to the application »f
eeservations in. the matter of promotion. Fer
Chis purpose, he has relied on the recent
Judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Caurt in
Jarnail Singh § Ors V. Lachhmi Narain Gupta ¢€
Ors. in SLP (Civil) No. 30621 of 2011 which
considered the need te review the judgment
fendered an M. Nagaraj (supra) by a Seven
Judge Bench and denied such a requirement but
Struck down a portion of the decisions that
Were ruled in wemmza$ (wave) on ee need to
carry out an exercise te Quantify
backwardness.