Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.44 seconds)
Smt. Suneeta Singh And Another vs State Of U.P. And 2 Ors on 31 May, 2022 cites

M/S New Victoria Mills vs Shrikant Arya on 27 September, 2021

In support of his above submission, learned counsel has relied upon a judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Special Appeal No.1188 of 2005 (M/S New Victoria Mills and others vs. Shri Kant Arya), decided on 12.3.2019 wherein the Division Bench has upheld the view taken by learned Single Judge that voluntarily retirement could not have been forced upon petitioner once he has already withdrawn his request before effective acceptance by competent authority.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 5 - S K Kaul - Full Document

Power Finance Corporation Ltd vs Pramod Kumar Bhatia on 17 March, 1997

In another judgment of a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Parshu Ram vs. State of U.P. Thru Director of Education and others in Writ A No.26670 of 2003, decided on 29.4.2011, Court has relied upon a judgment passed by the Supreme Court and held that "the question is squarely answered by the three decisions, namely, Balram Gupta v. Union of India & Anr. JT 1987 (3) SC 480: 1987 (Supp) SCC 228, J.N. Srivastava v. Union of India & Anr. (1998) 9 SCC 559, and Power Finance Corporation Ltd. v. Pramod Kumar Bhatia, JT 1997 (4) SC 300: (1997) 4 SCC 280, in which it was held that the resignation, in spite of its acceptance, can be withdrawn before the "effective date".
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 143 - Full Document

Smt. Suneeta And Another vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 25 June, 2020

6. Learned counsel also pointed out that when the application for V.R.S. was filed on 20.11.2012, the Senior Superintendent of Police, Varanasi has directed the Circle Officer, Chetganj, Varanasi to submit a report with regard to that whether V.R.S. sought by concerned person was on his own will, however, a report on such query was submitted belatedly. Meanwhile, petitioner no.1 and her husband approached this Court by way of filing a Writ A No.20395 of 2013 (Smt. Suneeta Singh and another vs. State of U.P. and others), which was disposed of with the direction to take a decision on the said letter. It was mentioned in letter dated 9.5.2014 that petitioner no.2 was under treatment for his mental illness.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - M C Tripathi - Full Document

Bhagwan Parshu Ram College Of Education vs National Council For Teachers ... on 26 February, 2014

In another judgment of a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Parshu Ram vs. State of U.P. Thru Director of Education and others in Writ A No.26670 of 2003, decided on 29.4.2011, Court has relied upon a judgment passed by the Supreme Court and held that "the question is squarely answered by the three decisions, namely, Balram Gupta v. Union of India & Anr. JT 1987 (3) SC 480: 1987 (Supp) SCC 228, J.N. Srivastava v. Union of India & Anr. (1998) 9 SCC 559, and Power Finance Corporation Ltd. v. Pramod Kumar Bhatia, JT 1997 (4) SC 300: (1997) 4 SCC 280, in which it was held that the resignation, in spite of its acceptance, can be withdrawn before the "effective date".
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - G S Sandhawalia - Full Document
1