Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.25 seconds)Bharatha Matha & Anr vs R. Vijaya Renganathan & Ors on 17 May, 2010
and the same has been reiterated by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court of India in the case of Bharatha Matha and Another vs.
R.Vijaya Renganathan and Others reported in (2010) 11 SCC 483
and which has also been reiterated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of
India in the case of K.N. Nagarajappa and Others vs. H. Narasimha
Reddy reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 694.
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 6 in The Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Section 100 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 104 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Municipal Committee, Hoshiarpur vs Punjab State Electricity Board & Ors on 19 October, 2010
15 Under such overwhelming evidence, this Court is of the
considered view that the learned first appellate court has not
recorded any illegal finding while reversing the judgment of the
learned trial court in respect of the issue no. (6); as only because the
suit land was not shown in the return as bakasht land and the same is
only a revenue entry cannot obliterate the surrender by the registered
Second Appeal No. 108 of 2020
10
instrument made by the ancestors of the defendants nor can
extinguish the right and title accrued to the plaintiffs by execution of
the sale deed in their favour. Thus, this Court has no hesitation in
answering the first substantial question of law in the negative.
16 So far as the second substantial question of law is concerned,
it is a settled principle of law that the perversity so far as it relates to
the interfering with the finding of facts by the High Court in exercise
of the jurisdiction under Section 100 and 104 of the Code of Civil
Procedure, that if a finding of fact is arrived at by ignoring or
excluding the relevant materials or by taking into consideration the
irrelevant material or if the finding, so outrageously defies the logic as
to suffer from the vice of irrationality incurring the blame of being
perverse, then the finding is rendered infirm in the eyes of law or if
the finding of the court is based on no evidence or evidence, which is
thoroughly unreliable or the evidence that suffers from the vice of
procedural irregularity or the findings are such that no reasonable
person, would have arrived at those findings then the findings may
be said to be perverse, as has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court of India in the case of Municipal Committee, Hoshiarpur vs.
Punjab State Electricity Board & Ors. reported in (2010) 13 SCC 216,
para 28 of which reads as under :-
K.N.Nagarajappa vs H.Narasimha Reddy on 9 September, 2021
and the same has been reiterated by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court of India in the case of Bharatha Matha and Another vs.
R.Vijaya Renganathan and Others reported in (2010) 11 SCC 483
and which has also been reiterated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of
India in the case of K.N. Nagarajappa and Others vs. H. Narasimha
Reddy reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 694.
Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act, 1908
The Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950
1