Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.28 seconds)Section 65 in The Finance Act, 2018 [Entire Act]
Section 67 in The Finance Act, 2018 [Entire Act]
Airlines Agents Association vs Union Of India (Uoi) on 13 April, 2001
32. It has, therefore, to be examined whether the appellant rendered
any service to the airlines or services were rendered by the appellant only
to the sub-agents. To appreciate this issue, it would be pertinent to refer
to the decision of the Madras High Court in Airlines Agents Association
vs. Union of India 10. It was sought to be contended by the Airlines
Agents Association that air travel agents were promoting the business of
the airlines and in consideration of such services the airlines were paying
commission to the air travel agents. It was also contended that the
commission received from the airlines had nothing to do with the services
offered by the air travel agents to the passengers. The Madras High Court
did not accept these two contentions and held that it was the air travel
agents who were rendering services to the passengers. The High Court,
therefore, held that the commission paid to the air travel agents by the
airlines had a direct nexus to the "air travel agent" services rendered by
the air travel agent to the passengers, even if it indirectly benefited the
business of the airlines. The High Court, therefore, held that air travel
agents were not promoting or marketing the business of the airlines. The
relevant portion of the judgment of the High Court is reproduced below:
Section 68 in The Finance Act, 2018 [Entire Act]
Section 66 in The Finance Act, 2018 [Entire Act]
Section 21 in The Finance Act, 2018 [Entire Act]
The Bihar Finance Act, 2006
Finance Act, 1999
Kafila Hospitality And Travels Pvt Ltd vs Service Tax - Delhi on 17 September, 2021
In this connection, reliance has been placed on the
judgment of the Madras High Court in Airlines Agents
Association vs. Union of India 8 and to a larger bench
decision of the Tribunal in Kafila Hospitality and Travels
Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner, Service Tax Delhi 9;
1