Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 50 (1.01 seconds)

Miss A. Sundarambal vs Government Of Goa, Daman And Diu & Ors on 27 July, 1988

As regards the management of Brahampuri Nursery Model School, workman / claimant / applicant has pleaded that she was working as a 'teacher' Page 41 to 55 (ANAND SWAROOP AGGARWAL) POLC - XI / KKD / DELHI / 16.09.2015 Mrs. Vijaya Tiwari Vs M/s. Brahmpuri Public School & Anr. ID No. 824/04 on part time with Brahampuri Nursery Model School. As per case law reported as Miss A. Sundarambal Vs. Government of Goa, Daman and Diu & Ors. JT 1987 (2) 101 the teachers employed by educational institutions whether the said institutions are imparting primary, secondary, graduate or post graduate education cannot be called as 'workman' within the meaning of section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. HOWEVER, workman / claimant / applicant in the rejoinder has pleaded that she was working as a full time Cashier for both the school and as per instructions of the management she was teaching the nursery classes in the absence of any other teacher or shortage of staff. Workman / claimant / applicant in the rejoinder, while denying the stand taken by management(s) in the WS to the effect that there was no connection / relation between Brahampuri Public School and Brahampuri Public Nursery Model School, pleaded that there was never any coaching centre for nursery classes and there was and there is a public school only and Brahampuri Public School and Nursery Model School both are located in the same building management; office set up and staff are same. It is in this background that this issue deserves to be decided.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 188 - A P Sen - Full Document

Hindustan Prefab Ltd. vs Labour Commissioner And Ors. on 19 November, 2003

Delhi High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 8 - M Mudgal - Full Document

Nehru Yuva Kendra Sangathan vs Union Of India & Others on 26 May, 2000

(xi) T. N. Vishakantaiah Vs. Management of Masoor Petro Chemicals Ltd., Richur, 2005 LLR (162 Karn HC); (xii) Tungabhadra Board Vs. Easu 2000 (LLR Karn HC); (xiii) Nehru Yuva Kendra Sangathan Vs. Union of India 2000 (LLR 776 Del HC); (xiv) Union of India Vs. Sh. Gajanan Maharaj Sansthan Page 33 to 55 (ANAND SWAROOP AGGARWAL) POLC - XI / KKD / DELHI / 16.09.2015 Mrs. Vijaya Tiwari Vs M/s. Brahmpuri Public School & Anr. ID No. 824/04 2002 (5 SCC 44 2002); (xv) Principal Kendriya Vidhayala Vs. Uttam Bose 2004 (ILL 686 GAU HC); (xvi) Sports Authority of India Vs. Sports Authority of India Kamgar Union 2005 LLR 541; (xvii) Manipal Academy of Higher Education Vs. State of Karnataka 2007 LLR 1119 SN (KARN HC); (xviii) K. H. Pandhi Vs. Presiding Officer Additional Labour Court 110/2004 BLT 101 (Del HC); (xix) Bangalore Water Supply & Sewerage Board, etc.
Delhi High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 134 - A K Sikri - Full Document

Sports Authority Of India vs Sports Authority Of India, Kamgar Union ... on 25 November, 2004

(xi) T. N. Vishakantaiah Vs. Management of Masoor Petro Chemicals Ltd., Richur, 2005 LLR (162 Karn HC); (xii) Tungabhadra Board Vs. Easu 2000 (LLR Karn HC); (xiii) Nehru Yuva Kendra Sangathan Vs. Union of India 2000 (LLR 776 Del HC); (xiv) Union of India Vs. Sh. Gajanan Maharaj Sansthan Page 33 to 55 (ANAND SWAROOP AGGARWAL) POLC - XI / KKD / DELHI / 16.09.2015 Mrs. Vijaya Tiwari Vs M/s. Brahmpuri Public School & Anr. ID No. 824/04 2002 (5 SCC 44 2002); (xv) Principal Kendriya Vidhayala Vs. Uttam Bose 2004 (ILL 686 GAU HC); (xvi) Sports Authority of India Vs. Sports Authority of India Kamgar Union 2005 LLR 541; (xvii) Manipal Academy of Higher Education Vs. State of Karnataka 2007 LLR 1119 SN (KARN HC); (xviii) K. H. Pandhi Vs. Presiding Officer Additional Labour Court 110/2004 BLT 101 (Del HC); (xix) Bangalore Water Supply & Sewerage Board, etc.
Delhi High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 17 - S Kumar - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next