Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.26 seconds)Smt. Seetha And Ors. vs Kayiyath Krishnan And Ors. on 25 November, 1974
Those two items according to the counsel, are self-acquired properties of Nabeesumma. Counsel also pointed out A2 Razi referred to by the counsel for the appellant was not signed by the first defendant, consequently it would not bind her. She also submitted there is no reason to interfere with the order passed by the Tribunal. Counsel furthey submitted that the decision reported in 1971 KLR 222 was later overruled by a Full Bench of this Court in Seetha and Ors. v. Krishnan and Ors., 1975 KLT 156.
Kunhacha Umma vs Kutti Mammi Hajee on 13 December, 1892
While resolving the apparent conflict the Full Bench referred to some of the decisions of the Madras High Court in Kunhacha Umma v. Kutti Mammi Hajee, ILR 16 Madras 201, Koroth Amman Kutti v. Perungottit Appu Nambiar, ILR 29 Madras 322, Pattathemvath Pathumma v. Mannamkunniyil Abdulla Haji, ILR 31 Madras 228, Kalliani Amma v. Govinda Menon, ILR 35 Madras 648, Chakkra Kannan v. Kunhi Pokker, ILR 39 Madras 317, Kundankutty v. Parkum Natukandi, AIR 1917 Mad.
Koroth Amman Kutti vs Perungottil Appu Nambiar And Anr. on 31 January, 1906
While resolving the apparent conflict the Full Bench referred to some of the decisions of the Madras High Court in Kunhacha Umma v. Kutti Mammi Hajee, ILR 16 Madras 201, Koroth Amman Kutti v. Perungottit Appu Nambiar, ILR 29 Madras 322, Pattathemvath Pathumma v. Mannamkunniyil Abdulla Haji, ILR 31 Madras 228, Kalliani Amma v. Govinda Menon, ILR 35 Madras 648, Chakkra Kannan v. Kunhi Pokker, ILR 39 Madras 317, Kundankutty v. Parkum Natukandi, AIR 1917 Mad.
K.P. Kalliani Amma And K.P. Karunakara ... vs K.P. Govinda Menon And Twenty-Two Ors. on 20 September, 1911
While resolving the apparent conflict the Full Bench referred to some of the decisions of the Madras High Court in Kunhacha Umma v. Kutti Mammi Hajee, ILR 16 Madras 201, Koroth Amman Kutti v. Perungottit Appu Nambiar, ILR 29 Madras 322, Pattathemvath Pathumma v. Mannamkunniyil Abdulla Haji, ILR 31 Madras 228, Kalliani Amma v. Govinda Menon, ILR 35 Madras 648, Chakkra Kannan v. Kunhi Pokker, ILR 39 Madras 317, Kundankutty v. Parkum Natukandi, AIR 1917 Mad.
Machikandi Parkum Maramittath ... vs Varayalankandi Kunhi Pokker And Ors. on 12 August, 1915
While resolving the apparent conflict the Full Bench referred to some of the decisions of the Madras High Court in Kunhacha Umma v. Kutti Mammi Hajee, ILR 16 Madras 201, Koroth Amman Kutti v. Perungottit Appu Nambiar, ILR 29 Madras 322, Pattathemvath Pathumma v. Mannamkunniyil Abdulla Haji, ILR 31 Madras 228, Kalliani Amma v. Govinda Menon, ILR 35 Madras 648, Chakkra Kannan v. Kunhi Pokker, ILR 39 Madras 317, Kundankutty v. Parkum Natukandi, AIR 1917 Mad.
Mukkil Maruthur Sankara Menon And Ors. vs Mukkil Maruthur Gopala Menon And Ors. on 1 April, 1921
Reference was made to the Full Bench because of an apparent conflict between the views expressed on the said question in two Division Bench rulings of this Court in Prabhakara Menon v. Gopala Menon and Ors., 1960 KLJ 161 and in Lakshmi Amma v. Anandan Nambiar, 1973 KLT 753.
Lekshmi Amma And Ors. vs Anandan Nambiar And Ors. on 21 June, 1973
Reference was made to the Full Bench because of an apparent conflict between the views expressed on the said question in two Division Bench rulings of this Court in Prabhakara Menon v. Gopala Menon and Ors., 1960 KLJ 161 and in Lakshmi Amma v. Anandan Nambiar, 1973 KLT 753.
Vadakke Chathilingath Kaliani Amma And ... vs Vadakke Chathilingath Karthiyani Amma ... on 1 September, 1926
726, Kalliani Amma v. Kanhiyani Amma, AIR 1927 Madras 299, Tatha Amma v. Thankappa, AIR 1947 Madras 137, Bhaskaran v. Kavunni, AIR 1954 Mad. 987 and several other decisions. Ultimately the Full Bench concluded as follows:
1