Chandra Prakash Shahi vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 25 April, 2000
Thus, this judgment is not applicable as in that case the probation
period of the employee was over and in this case the employee was still on
probation.
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.18 seconds)Pavanendra Narayan Verma vs Sanjay Gandhi P.G.I. Of Medical Sci. & ... on 5 November, 2001
Insofar as the judgment relied upon by
learned counsel for the employee in Chandra Prakash Shahi's case (supra) is
concerned, the Supreme Court in Pavanendra Narayan Verma's case (supra)
had discussed this judgment to the following effect: -
Dhanjibhai Ramjibhai vs State Of Gujarat on 22 January, 1985
In Dhanjibhai Ramjibhai's case (supra), the Supreme Court had
observed as under: -
Guru Nanak University vs Dr. (Mrs.) Iqbal Kaur Sandhu And Ors. on 17 May, 1975
In Guru Nanak University's case (supra), in respect of
marshaling each and every defect/shortcoming of the work and conduct of the
employee, this Court had observed as under: -
The Haryana Affiliated Colleges (Security of Service) Act, 1979
Smt. Pushpa Sharma And Others vs The State Of Haryana And Others on 31 March, 2009
CWP No.4730 of 1988 titled as 'Smt. Pushpa Sharma Vs. The State
of Haryana and others' [for short "second writ petition"] is directed by the
employee questioning jurisdiction of the Managing Committee in extending the
period of probation by its decision taken vide Annexure P-3, the decision taken
for dispensing with her services vide Annexure P-8 and order Annexure P-9 by
which she had been asked to demit the office. The second writ petition was
admitted on 06.09.1988 with the following order: -
1