Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (1.70 seconds)
Branch Manager vs Channappa on 12 February, 2020 cites

National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Swaran Singh & Ors on 5 January, 2004

The award passed by the Tribunal directing the insurance company to pay the compensation amount awarded to the claimants and thereafter, recover the same from the owner of the vehicle in question, is in accordance with the judgment passed by this Court in Swaran Singh [National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Swaran Singh, (2004) 3 SCC 297 : 2004 SCC (Cri) 733] and Laxmi Narain Dhut [National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Laxmi Narain Dhut, (2007) 3 SCC 700 : (2007) 2 SCC (Cri) 142] cases. While so, in our view, the High Court ought not to have interfered with the award passed by the Tribunal directing the first respondent to pay and recover from the owner of the vehicle.
Supreme Court of India Cites 68 - Cited by 3847 - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Laxmi Narain Dhut on 2 March, 2007

The award passed by the Tribunal directing the insurance company to pay the compensation amount awarded to the claimants and thereafter, recover the same from the owner of the vehicle in question, is in accordance with the judgment passed by this Court in Swaran Singh [National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Swaran Singh, (2004) 3 SCC 297 : 2004 SCC (Cri) 733] and Laxmi Narain Dhut [National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Laxmi Narain Dhut, (2007) 3 SCC 700 : (2007) 2 SCC (Cri) 142] cases. While so, in our view, the High Court ought not to have interfered with the award passed by the Tribunal directing the first respondent to pay and recover from the owner of the vehicle.
Supreme Court of India Cites 26 - Cited by 573 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Pappu @ Manoj vs Vinod Kumar on 19 November, 2019

"15. We are of the view that the High Court has already granted more than just compensation amount to the legal representatives of the deceased (Satish). In that, even if the claim of the appellants regarding future prospects, additional medical expenses and additional interest amount was to be accepted, on the basis of the notional income of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand) per month, the question of awarding additional or further compensation amount to the appellants in MFA No.5874 of 2011 does not arise. The 39 appeal, however, would succeed to the limited extent that the amount of compensation determined by the High Court shall be first paid by Respondent 1 Insurance Company with liberty to recover the same from the owner of the ofrfending vehicle (Respondent 2 herein). We are inclined to allow the appeal to this limited extent, keeping in mind the exposition in Singh Ram Vs. Nirmala and Pappu Vs. Vinod Kumar Lamba.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 8 - Full Document
1   2 Next