Sunaina Sharma vs The State Of Jammu And Kashmir on 26 October, 2017
8. The facts of Sunaina Sharma's case, are however, different from the
present case, inasmuch as, according to the facts in Sunaina Sharma's case,
the retrospective promotion to the officer was dependent also upon the fact
that the person should have worked against that post, and in that view of
the matter, the financial benefit was not given with the retrospective effect, in
-3-
that case. In the aforesaid case there appeared to be latches on the part of the
State in giving the promotion to the employee, whereas, in the present case,
the promotion was denied to the writ petitioners solely due to the latches of
the State Government, and the promotion had been given to the petitioners
with retrospective effect, only after the order passed by this Court in WP(S)
No.6250 of 2006, and after filing the contempt application for
implementation of the order.