Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.40 seconds)

Bhagat Ram Sharma vs Union Of India & Ors on 13 November, 1987

In the case of Bhagat Ram Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors. reported at 1988 (Supp) SCC 30, in paragraph nos. 17 and 18, Hon'ble Apex Court has taken note of legislative practice that while deleting existing provision, new provision is substituted. It found that this has the effect of repeal of the existing provision and introduction of a new provision. It has then concluded that there is no real distinction between 'repeal' and an 'amendment'. It has found that amendment is a wider term including abrogation or deletion of a provision in an existing statute.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 97 - A P Sen - Full Document

State Of West Bengal vs Kesoram Industries Ltd. And Ors on 15 January, 2004

9. Perusal of judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of W.B. Vs. Kesoram Industries Ltd. and others reported at (2004) 10 SCC 201, paragraph 138 reveals that words used by legislature in a statute need to be understood by keeping in mind the fact that selection thereof is with due deliberation and to give its effect to its intention. Each word therefore, must be given its due meaning. If in definition clause, such words have been given any meaning that meaning or otherwise their ordinary meaning by referring to dictionaries, therefore, must be gathered.
Supreme Court of India Cites 258 - Cited by 433 - R C Lahoti - Full Document
1   2 Next