Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 31 (4.01 seconds)Section 7 in The Designs Act, 2000 [Entire Act]
Dart Industries Inc vs Techno Plastic Industries on 23 November, 2022
As rightly
contended by the learned Counsel for the Respondents, the ruling cited by the
learned Counsel for the Plaintiff in (i) MANU/TN/1047/2018 in the case of
Preethi Kitchen Appliances Pvt. Ltd. vs. Baghyaa Home Appliances
Electronics & Furniture and others; (ii) MANU/TN/8583/2022 in the case of
Dart Industries Inc. and Others vs. Techno Plastics Industries and (iii) 1998
SCC OnLine Cal 423 in the case of Rotomac Pens Limited vs. Milap Chand
and Co. will not help the Plaintiff in this case. The facts in the present case
are different from the facts stated in the above rulings.
Section 22 in The Designs Act, 2000 [Entire Act]
Section 19 in The Designs Act, 2000 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Designs Act, 2000 [Entire Act]
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 38 in The Designs Act, 2000 [Entire Act]
Rotomac Pens Ltd vs S. Milap Chand & Co on 8 September, 2015
As rightly
contended by the learned Counsel for the Respondents, the ruling cited by the
learned Counsel for the Plaintiff in (i) MANU/TN/1047/2018 in the case of
Preethi Kitchen Appliances Pvt. Ltd. vs. Baghyaa Home Appliances
Electronics & Furniture and others; (ii) MANU/TN/8583/2022 in the case of
Dart Industries Inc. and Others vs. Techno Plastics Industries and (iii) 1998
SCC OnLine Cal 423 in the case of Rotomac Pens Limited vs. Milap Chand
and Co. will not help the Plaintiff in this case. The facts in the present case
are different from the facts stated in the above rulings.