Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.29 seconds)
Chunilal vs State on 28 April, 2010 cites

Prabhodrai Dhirajram Nayak vs The District Panchayat, Surat And Ors. on 1 March, 1983

Coming to the judgments cited by the learned counsel for the petitioner, in (Shri) Prabodhrai Dhirajram Nayak v. (The) District Panchayat, Surat and others (supra), the Court was dealing with the issue of removal of the Chairman of the Nagar Panchayat. A preliminary inquiry was made in respect of the allegations against the Chairman and on the basis of the said inquiry, a notice was issued but the statements of persons recorded at the inquiry were not supplied to the petitioner therein. A learned Single Judge of this Court held that the order of removal was illegal and deserved to be quashed. This is what the Court has stated:
Gujarat High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 6 - Full Document

Mohinder Singh Gill & Anr vs The Chiief Election Commissioner, New ... on 2 December, 1977

26. It is now an accepted proposition of law that any statutory body which is entrusted by statute with discretion, must act fairly. It does not matter whether its functions are described as judicial or quasi-judicial on the one hand, or as administrative on the other. Even an administrative order, which involves civil consequences must be made consistently with the rules of natural justice. Although, the expression `civil consequences' has not been defined anywhere, the observation made in Mohindar Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner, 1978 (1) SCC 405 at Para 66 on page 440 is relevant in this context, and reads as below:
Supreme Court of India Cites 56 - Cited by 4221 - V R Iyer - Full Document
1