Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.28 seconds)The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 2 in The Factories Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Narinder Singh vs New India Assurance Company Ltd And Ors on 4 September, 2014
It appears that the vehicle in question was being used in a public place at the time of accident, therefore, on the basis of judgment in Narinder Singh vs. New India Assurance Company Ltd. and Others, Bhagwat vs. The United India Insurance Company Limited, Din Dayal v. National Insurance Company & Anr., Niranjan Kumar Yadav vs. National Insurance Company Limited, Saleena Rani vs. United India Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr. (Supra), it appears that the Certificate of Registration is mandatory, but the complainant was using the vehicle in question without any valid registration. It amounts breach of fundamental terms and conditions of the policy and provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act,1988, therefore, the O.P. is not liable to compensate the complainant.
Niranjan Kumar Yadav vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. on 29 March, 2011
It appears that the vehicle in question was being used in a public place at the time of accident, therefore, on the basis of judgment in Narinder Singh vs. New India Assurance Company Ltd. and Others, Bhagwat vs. The United India Insurance Company Limited, Din Dayal v. National Insurance Company & Anr., Niranjan Kumar Yadav vs. National Insurance Company Limited, Saleena Rani vs. United India Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr. (Supra), it appears that the Certificate of Registration is mandatory, but the complainant was using the vehicle in question without any valid registration. It amounts breach of fundamental terms and conditions of the policy and provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act,1988, therefore, the O.P. is not liable to compensate the complainant.
Ms. Saleena Rani vs United India Insurance Company ... on 8 December, 2014
It appears that the vehicle in question was being used in a public place at the time of accident, therefore, on the basis of judgment in Narinder Singh vs. New India Assurance Company Ltd. and Others, Bhagwat vs. The United India Insurance Company Limited, Din Dayal v. National Insurance Company & Anr., Niranjan Kumar Yadav vs. National Insurance Company Limited, Saleena Rani vs. United India Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr. (Supra), it appears that the Certificate of Registration is mandatory, but the complainant was using the vehicle in question without any valid registration. It amounts breach of fundamental terms and conditions of the policy and provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act,1988, therefore, the O.P. is not liable to compensate the complainant.
The Manager Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd vs K.Babu @ Babu Abdul Rashid on 19 April, 2012
29. The learned District Forum has also observed in para 8 & 9 of the impugned order that the vehicle in question was not registered at the time of accident and complainant has not get the vehicle registered. The District Forum has observed the vehicle in question was not being used at a public place, therefore, the certificate of registration is not mandatory. On the basis of above cited judgment Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. V. Abdul Rashid and others (Supra), it appears that vehicle in question was taken to garage for repairing work and garage is a public place.
Mr.Bhagwat Prasad Garg vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd. on 15 March, 2013
It appears that the vehicle in question was being used in a public place at the time of accident, therefore, on the basis of judgment in Narinder Singh vs. New India Assurance Company Ltd. and Others, Bhagwat vs. The United India Insurance Company Limited, Din Dayal v. National Insurance Company & Anr., Niranjan Kumar Yadav vs. National Insurance Company Limited, Saleena Rani vs. United India Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr. (Supra), it appears that the Certificate of Registration is mandatory, but the complainant was using the vehicle in question without any valid registration. It amounts breach of fundamental terms and conditions of the policy and provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act,1988, therefore, the O.P. is not liable to compensate the complainant.
The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Smt.Potru Vijaya Lakshmi on 5 May, 2010
In United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v Lakshmi, 1997 ACJ 489 (Kerala), after quoting the observations of Barry, J. in R v. Kane, 1965 1 All ER 705, it was held as follows :-