Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.19 seconds)
Dr J Selvam vs Union Public Service Commission on 6 March, 2025 cites

Union Of India & Anr vs A.K. Narula on 18 May, 2007

5 OA 310/1100/2024 3.1 The respondents submit that in discharge of the Constitutional obligations of making recruitment to all Civil Services and posts under the Government of India, the Commission acts strictly in terms of the Recruitment Rules and the terms of the advertisement. It is settled proposition of law that in exercise of the power of judicial review, the Courts review not the decision but the decision-making process. Only if the decision-making process is vitiated by arbitrariness, bias or malafides would the Courts interfere in the decision-making process. Reference in this regard be made to UOI Vs. A.K. Narula, (2007) 11 SCC 10. Since in the instant case the action of the answering Respondent is not vitiated by arbitrariness, bias or malafides, this Hon'ble Tribunal may not like to interfere into the same. 3.2 The respondents further submit that the said post was advertised vide Advt. No. 16/2023 (Vacancy No. 23081610326) on 26-08-2023 with closing date 14-09-2023. The vacancy is suitable for candidates belonging to category of Persons with Benchmark Disability (PwBD) viz. Blindness and Low Vision with disability i.e. Low Vision (LV), Locomotor Disability including Cerebral Palsy, Leprosy Cured, Dwarfism, Acid Attack Victims and Muscular 6 OA 310/1100/2024 Dystrophy with disability i.e. One leg affected (R or L) (OL) or One arm affected (R or L) (OA) or One leg and One arm affected (OLA) or Leprosy Cured (LC) or Dwarfism (DW) or Acid Attack Victims (AAV).
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 53 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

Union Public Service Commission And ... vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi And Others on 25 January, 2010

7. The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case titled Union Public Service Commission vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & others, W.P. (C) 10058/2009 12 decided on 25th January, 13 OA 310/1100/2024 2010 held that no deviation from the terms and conditions of an advertisement and rules for the recruitment for a public office shall be permitted, as such deviation would result in gross injustice to other candidates.
Delhi High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 30 - M B Lokur - Full Document

Chhattisgarh Public Service ... vs Chhattisgarh State Information ... on 21 August, 2018

Hon. High court of Delhi again in decision delivered in Union Public Services Commission v Tarun Arora, W.P. (C) 3003/2016 decided on 01st February, 2017 has held that while there is no strait jacket precept to balance the administrative difficulties that may arise as a result of rectifying a lapse, the Court would give precedence to the compelling difficulties which may arise upon considering the application. The relevant para is extracted below:
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 5 - Full Document
1