Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.30 seconds)Section 114 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 6 in The Hindu Minority And Guardianship Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 8 in The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 8 in The Hindu Minority And Guardianship Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 6 in The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Nirmal Chandra Ray And Ors. vs Khandu Ghose And Ors. on 16 December, 1963
xxx xxx xxx
"It is a settled principle of law that a decree against a minor
defendant without appointment of guardian ad-litem is void and
inoperative in law, but in a case where the minor is effectively represented
in a suit by a guardian although not formally appointed and where such
minor suffered no prejudice on account of such informality, the absence
of formal order of appointment of guardian is not fatal to the suit (Nirmal
Vs. Khandu AIR 1965 Cal.
Keshav Chander Thakur & Anr. vs Krishan Chander & Ors. on 19 May, 2014
In this regard, the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in
Keshav Chander Thakur & Anr. v. Krishan Chander & Ors., 2014 SCC
OnLine Del 3092 authoritatively answers the issue raised in this petition that
since an order for appointment of guardian ad-litem is a formal order, non-
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Nagaiah vs Chowdamma (Dead) By Lrs. on 8 January, 2018
In this regard, it would also be instructive to refer to dicta of Supreme
Court in Nagaiah and another v. Chowdamma (dead) by Legal
Representatives and another (2018) 2 SCC 504 wherein similarly, the
Supreme Court has held that a decree passed against the minor cannot be set
aside in the absence of prejudice to the minor defendant. The relevant portion
of the judgment reads as under: