Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.16 seconds)
Sreedevi Keezhoth vs The State Of Kerala on 30 January, 2026 cites

Karuvarakundu Ventures (Llp) vs State Of Kerala on 29 March, 2023

This court in Arthasasthra Ventures (India) LLP v. State of Kerala [2022 (4) KLT OnLine 1222] has held that the most relevant aspect while considering Form-5 application is whether the land in question was a paddy land or a wetland when the Act, 2008 came into force and whether the land is fit for paddy cultivation and if the Revenue Divisional Officer was not satisfied with the available materials, ought to have resorted to scientific data including satellite photographs obtained from KSREC.
Kerala High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 20 - P Gopinath - Full Document

Muraleedhar K Nair vs Revenue Divisional Officer on 8 June, 2022

This court in Muraleedharan Nair v. Revenue Divisional Officer [2023 (4) KLT 270] has held that when the petitioner seeks removal of his land from the Data Bank, it will not be sufficient for the Revenue Divisional Officer to dismiss the application simply stating that the LLMC has decided not to remove the land from the Data Bank. The Revenue Divisional Officer being the competent authority, has to independently assess the status of the land and come to a conclusion that removal of the land from Data Bank will adversely affect WP(C) No.23096 of 2021 6 2026:KER:7767 paddy cultivation in the land in question or in the nearby paddy lands or that it will adversely affect sustenance of wetlands in the area and in the absence of such findings, the impugned order is unsustainable.
Kerala High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 24 - N Nagaresh - Full Document
1