Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.31 seconds)
Firdaus Amrut Higher Secondary School, ... vs M.M. Dave on 19 April, 1991 cites

Chikkala Samuel vs District Educational Officer, ... on 1 October, 1981

21. It should be mentioned at this stage that Mr. N. C. Thakkar, Ld. Advocate or respondents relied upon the decision in the case of Chikkala Samuel v. Deo, Hyderabad reported in AIR 1982 AP 64. By the said decision he wanted to make good the point that an institution established and run by minority community is to be distinguished from an institution established and run by a person belonging to minority community. I do not think this decision is, in any way, of any help to Mr. Thakkar, nor does it help in deciding the point under discussion, In view of the observations of the Supreme Court I do not think it necessary to refer to the decision of A. P. High Court in detail.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 10 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

Indulal Hiralal Shah And Ors. vs S.S. Salgaonkar And Ors. on 24 December, 1982

20. Mr. M. J. Thakor referred to the decision of Bombay High Court in the case of Indulal Hiralal Shah v. S. S. Salgonkar reported in AIR 1983 Bom 192. In the case before the Bombay High Court the educational institution was run by Gujaratis in the State of Maharashtra and the question arose as to whether the petitioners belonged to minority community and whether they established and administered any educational institution. It was contended before the Bombay High Court that there was provision in the trust deed permitting induction of persons belonging to other community, and therefore, it could not be said to be a minority institution.
Bombay High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1