Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (0.67 seconds)

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad vs Union Of India & Ors on 6 July, 2011

29. Learned Amicus Curiae placed reliance upon T.N. Godavarman(87) v. Union of India13, and submitted that this Court in Para 72 recognised that the National Forest Policy, 1988, has a statutory flavour. It provides for the identification of protected areas, recognition of customary rights over the forest areas, forest conservation with the involvement of the local community, and the need for regular surveys of forest resources.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 808 - S H Kapadia - Full Document

State Of Bihar vs Banshi Ram Modi & Ors on 7 May, 1985

The earlier decision of this Court in State of Bihar v. Banshi Ram Modi [(1985) 3 SCC 643] has, therefore, to be understood in the light of these subsequent decisions. We consider it necessary to reiterate this settled position emerging from the decisions of this Court to dispel the doubt, if any, in the perception of any State Government or authority. This has become necessary also because of the stand taken on behalf of the State of Rajasthan, even at this late stage, relating to permissions granted for mining in such area which is clearly contrary to the decisions of this Court. It is reasonable to assume that any State Government which has failed to appreciate the correct position in law so far, will forthwith correct its stance and take the necessary remedial measures without any further delay.” (emphasis supplied)
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 83 - E S Venkataramiah - Full Document
1   2 Next