Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.22 seconds)
Sc No: 101/13 State vs . Raju Yadav on 5 November, 2015 cites

The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Mukesh Yadav @ Pappu Judgement Given By: ... on 4 September, 2013

" My date of birth is 21.04.1996. at the time of incident, I was studying in 9th class in Government Girls Senior Secondary School, Bakhtawarpur. Prior to this, I was studying at my maternal grand mother in Samastipur, Bihar upto 8th class. Accused Raju is my distant relative. On 18.02.2012, I was going to my school situated at Bakhtawarpur at about 8pm. Raju met me on the way and stated that I should accompany him in a Pooja performed at Village Bakhtawarpur. He boarded me in a vehicle (Chhota Judgment 10 of 19 SC No: 101/13 State Vs. Raju Yadav Haathi) and forcefully taken me to Panipat. He kept me in the house of his relative. He has committed sex with me repeatedly. In Panipat he kept me for one month. From the Panipat he took me to Sahu Palli, District Darbhanga, Bihar in the house some relative by train. There also accused Raju Yadav committed sexual intercourse with me. There accused also used to give beating when I used to say him that I want to meet my mother and father and he stated to me that I will have to remain with him in the said village. Due to sexual intercourse by accused, I got pregnant. Accused want to run away from there leaving me in the said village, therefore, the relative of the accused took me and accused to the local PS. Accused had threatened me in the PS that if I will give any statement against him, he will got killed my mother and father and got kidnap my sister. Local police official made call to the local Police of Delhi and Delhi police officials alongwith my parents came there and brought me and accused Raju Yadav at Delhi......"
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 6 - B D Rathi - Full Document

State Of U.P. vs Rajesh Yadav & Another on 7 February, 2014

iv) The physical relationship between the parties had clearly developed with the consent of the prosecutrix, as there was neither a case of any resistance, nor had she raised any complaint anywhere at any time despite the fact that she had been living with the accused for several days and traveled with him from one place to Judgment 16 of 19 SC No: 101/13 State Vs. Raju Yadav another.
Allahabad High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1